Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Wethead Fuel requirements - Premium gas only?

  1. #1
    I am the .45% DBCasey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Frankfort, Kentucky
    Posts
    175

    Question Wethead Fuel requirements - Premium gas only?

    I thought i read in an article about the WC engine saying that it required Premium (93 or better) octane fuel.

    Can anyone confirm/deny that for me please?

    Many thanks,

    DC
    Last edited by DBCasey; 08-19-2013 at 08:46 PM.
    Thank a teacher if you can read this, thank a veteran that it's in English.

    D.B.Casey-MSF#133889
    2011 RT

  2. #2
    Registered User dancogan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    2,194
    Here's what it says on the back cover of the Rider's Manual:

    Recommended fuel quality Super unleaded, (max 10% ethanol, E10)
    89 AKI (95ROZ/RON)
    89 AKI

    Alternative fuel quality Regular unleaded (restrictions with regard to power and rule consumption. If the engine should for example be operated with 90 RON in countries with lower fuel quality, the motorcycle must be respectively programmed first by your authorized BMW Motorrad retailer.)
    87 AKI (91 ROZ/RON)
    87 AKI


    Now, if someone, once again, would explain the numbers, I would appreciate that. My pumps tend to say 87 (regular) 89 (or 91) and 93 (premium).
    Last edited by dancogan; 08-20-2013 at 12:31 AM.
    Dan

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    274
    Quote Originally Posted by DBCasey View Post
    I thought i read in an article about the WC engine saying that it required Premium (93 or better) octane fuel.

    Can anyone confirm/deny that for me please?

    Many thanks,

    DC
    There's no 93 in California, either. Best we get is 91.
    2000 R1100RT / 1987 K75C (RIP) / Santa Clarita, CA

  4. #4
    Hammam Hammam's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    201
    RON is the European standard. PON is the American standard.

    95 RON equals 91 PON.

    See it here:

    http://thoms1.net/Ford/Reference/RONMONPON.html

  5. #5
    I am the .45% DBCasey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Frankfort, Kentucky
    Posts
    175
    I wonder if the good folks who make the GS-911 will make a software update allowing it to change the fuel requirements? Not many gas stations sell premium fuel out in the "kuds" of Mongolia, Mexico or Africa
    .
    Thank a teacher if you can read this, thank a veteran that it's in English.

    D.B.Casey-MSF#133889
    2011 RT

  6. #6
    Registered User lkchris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    4,604
    So many folks appear to look at a premium fuel requirement as some sort of insult or deal breaker, but it's in fact a sign of an efficiently running motor. Compression = efficiency. Out in Mongolia better have plenty of fuel, as the bike will run through lots of it running at reduced efficiency.
    Kent Christensen
    21482
    '12 R1200RT, '02 R1100S, '84 R80G/S

  7. #7
    Cam Killer marchyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    3,305
    I'll repeat what dancogan wrote in different words: Premium is NOT required. AKI 89 is required per the manual. AKI 89 is NOT premium.

  8. #8
    Polarbear Polarbear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Clovis,CA
    Posts
    4,192

    Regular too;

    I don't own one, but coming back from the far North just recently, you will find only regular at dozens of stops up there. Im certain the new engine can handle the regular without much issue, on occasion. Glad my current gsa1200'07 cares less whats in tank. It runs anything, no complaints. Any world class mc should be able to, imo. You may have to alter your throttle manners a tad if the new engine burbs on regular, less aggression in the throttle until you find higher octane again. Just another oversight by BMW to produce an engine that needs higher performance fuels! Guess they ignore folks riding their bikes in far away places with no such gasoline. I also figure the regulations of such places as California plays a BIG part in nations around the world building vehicles/bikes!!! So the whole world follows the few and the extreme clean gets sold everywhere. STILL, you don't have to travel far to find regular gasoline ONLY, even in the lower 48 states. Its becoming moreso...Randy

  9. #9
    Registered User alan.coles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bedford, Nova Scotia
    Posts
    3
    While the manual does allow for running 89 AKi/PON or whatever the far-too-many standards are (89 in North America). My concern with running anything below 91 in North America is the Ethanol content which isn't supposed to be good for motorcycle engines.

    IIRC, almost all gas in CA has ethanol added @ 10%~, and all other states either follow suit or allow it in 89 and 87. There is however a growing problem with stations blending in more than the allowed 10%. If you could be certain you were getting ethanol-free gas than you'd have a different discussion. Because that isn't usually possible, I'm more comfortable using 91 to be safe.

    Fortunately, for me, in Nova Scotia and most other provinces, they don't used ethanol in 91, only in 87 and 89, so it is an easy decision for me. Use 91 and avoid ethanol.

    BTW, the octane requirement isn't really a sign of power/efficiency. It is a combination of combustion chamber design. Higher octane is harder to burn and therefore will withstand higher compression pressures before detonating than lower octane will. However, many well engineered engines can easily run 89 octane (NA) with higher compression using good cylinder-head design. Ford's DuraTec 3.5L was on the Ward's 10 Best Engines list for 2007 when it was introduced. The normally aspirated version runs a 10.3:1 compression ratio, produces 265HP and 250TQ using solid-lifters and running on 87 octane. When introduced it had the best figures in the world for running 87 and, I believe, was as good or better than anything running 89.
    Last edited by alan.coles; 08-23-2013 at 06:17 PM.

  10. #10
    Hammam Hammam's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    201
    Quote Originally Posted by alan.coles View Post
    While the manual does allow for running 89 AKi/PON or whatever the far-too-many standards are (89 in North America). My concern with running anything below 91 in North America is the Ethanol content which isn't supposed to be good for motorcycle engines.

    IIRC, almost all gas in CA has ethanol added @ 10%~, and all other states either follow suit or allow it in 89 and 87. There is however a growing problem with stations blending in more than the allowed 10%. If you could be certain you were getting ethanol-free gas than you'd have a different discussion. Because that isn't usually possible, I'm more comfortable using 91 to be safe.

    Fortunately, for me, in Nova Scotia and most other provinces, they don't used ethanol in 91, only in 87 and 89, so it is an easy decision for me. Use 91 and avoid ethanol.

    BTW, the octane requirement isn't really a sign of power/efficiency. It is a combination of combustion chamber design. Higher octane is harder to burn and therefore will withstand higher compression pressures before detonating than lower octane will. However, many well engineered engines can easily run 89 octane (NA) with higher compression using good cylinder-head design. Ford's DuraTec 3.5L was on the Ward's 10 Best Engines list for 2007 when it was introduced. The normally aspirated version runs a 10.3:1 compression ratio, produces 265HP and 250TQ using solid-lifters and running on 87 octane. When introduced it had the best figures in the world for running 87 and, I believe, was as good or better than anything running 89.
    I guess the compression ratio of the new LC is 12,5:1 as opposed to 12:1 for the previous GS 1200 boxer. The manual recommends Super unleaded 95 RON (which is 91 PON in North America), AND up to 10% ethanol max. So I wouldn't be too concerned about ethanol, since 10% is what is mixed in our fuels. That being said, I always try to find some 91 without ethanol, just for the sake of it. Shell, for one, offer ethanol-free 91 fuel. With my previous boxers (1200 GS and RT) I used to run 93 PON, because that's what the manual recommended, and only Petrocan and Sunoco offer it, but then they also add some kind of additives in it, which my chief mechanic advised against. So, I went down to 91 PON. And now I see that BMW have built a new boxer engine with both a higher compression ratio and a lower octane requirement. Plus tolerance for ethanol. Good.

    But I do have some put-putting at deceleration. Am I the only one?

  11. #11
    Registered User lkchris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    4,604
    Ethanol content isn't relevant since it's an octane enhancer in any event.
    Kent Christensen
    21482
    '12 R1200RT, '02 R1100S, '84 R80G/S

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •