Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 56

Thread: BMW Concept Ninety

  1. #31
    It is what it is. Bud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Long gone
    Posts
    6,493
    Quote Originally Posted by mika View Post
    What if they name it the R90S, I break my piggy bank and rob a bank so I can buy one then take the 90S markings off it; can I still post on the forum?
    Only if you post a picture of it!
    I used to post here, but now I don't.

  2. #32
    Certifiable Old Fart beemerdons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Chandler, AZ
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by ARGENT BRICK View Post
    BMW AG, what are you waiting for? There are many that believe the R90S is one of the best looking bikes of all time. We love the R90S. We want a R90S. Build us a retro looking boxer painted Daytona Orange with silver and red trim.

    The Britts seem to be doing well with retro looking bikes. Why not BMW?
    +1, Gunny; just let me know where I mail my down payment deposit check to, I want one!
    Don Stanley; aka Chuy Medina "El Burrito Ballerina"
    BMWMOA #24810; www.azbeemers.org/forum #89

  3. #33
    Registered User RINTY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    4,302
    I might prefer a 2 into 1...mika
    Yes, the 2 into 2 is a bit busy.

    Hopefully, BMW AG will put this bike on the show circuit, and generate some interest from younger buyers.

    So here's the idea that's bouncing around in my head. I win the lotto, and commission Roland to build a cafe using the Concept 90 frame pieces, an HP2 Sport engine, a Remus 2 into 1 exhaust, and the usual Ohlin good stuff. We deepen the front fairing a bit, to soften the parabolic shape, extend the seat shell back a few inches, and paint it Midnight Blue.
    Last edited by RINTY; 05-26-2013 at 04:05 PM.
    Rinty

    "When you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there."

  4. #34
    Still Wondering mika's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Fly Over Land
    Posts
    10,539
    Quote Originally Posted by RINTY View Post
    Hopefully, BMW AG will put this bike on the show circuit, and generate some interest from younger buyers.

    So here's the idea that's bouncing around in my head.
    I have a headache.

    My Roadster is back to basically stock condition. I have a box of parts for cafe and SM type setups. I see all sorts of ideas to steal from Sands' design, little things - more parts. More money. Do I play with the one I have or lord help me if BMW AG sells it do I buy a new one and start over?

    Lotto ticket - I have to save to buy one so its off to work for me. (My holiday weekend starts Tuesday)
    Pass the mustard and UP THE REVOLUTION!

    St. Paul Pioneer Press , Minneapolis Star Tribune

  5. #35
    Proud Veteran SteveAikens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Clovis, NM
    Posts
    942
    I like the bike but really don't see it a 'retro'. Don't care for the valve cover design at all. Doesn't suit my taste enough for my money - but nicely done overall - as a new style.
    Nom de Plume:
    Steve Aikens, Clovis, NM
    BMW MOA #6218
    IBA# 442

  6. #36
    Registered User RINTY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    4,302
    Quote Originally Posted by mika View Post
    I have a headache......do I buy a new one and start over?
    Actually, I was just musing.... I don't want any more stuff.
    Rinty

    "When you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there."

  7. #37
    No longer a member here
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,432
    I am one of these guys who are in the fortunate postion to be able to spend money on a new bike.
    For this one, I am not going to open my wallet.
    I have said this before elsewhere: It seems to me that all these new exciting concepts and bikes that get discussions and exposure laely are single seaters. What's up with that?
    Is the focus market for these concepts and designs all these lone wolves who need to get away from home and satisfy their mid-life crisis longings of becoming a bad-ass biker?
    I have three bikes in my stable that are single seaters and they get hardly ridden throughout the season. Just because I share the passion of riding motorcycles with my wife and she preferes to ride behind me, on one of our bikes, instead of one of her own (two) bikes.
    Put a real seat on that thing and I may be looking at it.

  8. #38
    Still Wondering mika's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Fly Over Land
    Posts
    10,539
    Saddles are a very interesting discussion if you can move past ride height. The UJM bench had the advantage of being able to carry two people with ease. It allowed the solo rider to move about when you were touring giving seating alternatives that would allow you to pile up more miles. The down side was you weren't supported fore and aft when sport riding. Now we have many bikes with hybrid saddles that allow two up while limiting the movement of the rider. Too often they are the worst of both worlds. I have played with a GS Adv saddle on my Roadster. The thing is comfortable in many ways, has just enough shape to help with the sport riding but creates some aesthetic challenges.

    I like Sands' design saddle and all. I can nit pic various things but I can do that with any bike. I prefer to ride solo so the saddle is not an issue. Bottom line (no pun intended) is it is a bike I would very much like to date but I am not certain I could live with it.
    Pass the mustard and UP THE REVOLUTION!

    St. Paul Pioneer Press , Minneapolis Star Tribune

  9. #39
    Registered User argent brick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Wine Country, Northern California
    Posts
    461
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveAikens View Post
    I like the bike but really don't see it a 'retro'. Don't care for the valve cover design at all. Doesn't suit my taste enough for my money - but nicely done overall - as a new style.
    I agree with you, but I really would like a retro bike. Give me a new front end, updated brakes, engine/trans, and a Paralever rear end. Keep the old style fairing and give it a seat that can handle riding two up. Throw a slash 7 style tank between them and your good to go. The tank could be made of aluminum to help keep the weight down and a two into one exhaust would be a nice touch.

    There is not really anything new here. Just an old school skin over boxer components already in production. The start up and tooling cost to BMW AG should be minimal.

    VW presented the "new" Beetle a few years back and it was a great hit. Sales ensured that VW of North America was able to keep their doors open instead of pulling out of the US market. Ford's retro looking Mustang has been a good seller and Dodge has done well with their Challenger. GM's Camero is even popular, but I am still asking myself why. The market is full of retro cars because there is a demand. Good time for BMW to bring out a retro motorcycle.
    Lynn
    MOA #57883
    Current Ride: 1995 K75 Standard
    Past: 1978 Yamaha XS 750, 1976 BMW R60/6

  10. #40
    Douglas Williams
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    319
    I don't understand the issue about the designation. I'm pretty sure the parts folks would have no trouble if I tried to buy parts for a 2014 R90S. They're pretty sharp that way. It's hardly precedent setting either as MB, Dodge, Ford and Chevrolet have rebadged new versions of old models. I like the Charger, the Mustang, even the new Shelby, not so much the Camaro and I like the 2013/14 R90S, name and all. This opinion from a 3-BMW bike owner, the newest a 1989 and all three airheads. Sadly, none of them an R90S.
    Doug
    Sent from a Galaxy, far, far away

  11. #41
    rsbeemer 22600's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Braunfels,Texas/Taichung, Taiwan
    Posts
    337
    Quote Originally Posted by 20774 View Post
    See, what do I know! I never made it out of 1978...at least they were still "pretty good" up that point?? However, in the grand scheme, going back to 1923, they have been true to unique numbering than not...I guess that is the point I was trying to make.

    I'd sure hate to obfuscate the venerable R90S Airhead. That's my vote...anything else except R90S!
    I'm with you Kurt, on the '78 and the name. I've had a R90s and don't think they should name this the same.
    What about R90ss ; the ss should mean it's faster, right?

    The younger generation does have different ideas is seems. I have a MC buddy in his 30's; there is nothing he rather do than burn the tires off his bike. He has to get a new rear tire every couple of months, sometimes sooner. He's a good family guy but just hates rubber.

    DW
    1978 R100rs MOA#22600 125cc Kymco
    The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails.

  12. #42
    Administrator 20774's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    13,003
    Quote Originally Posted by 22600 View Post
    What about R90ss ; the ss should mean it's faster, right?
    +1000 Me likey!
    Kurt -- Forum Administrator ---> Resources and Links Thread <---
    '78 R100/7 & '69 R69S & '52 R25/2
    mine-ineye-deatheah-pielayah-jooa-kalayus. oolah-minane-hay-meeriah-kal-oyus-algay-a-thaykin', buddy!

  13. #43
    Still Wondering mika's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Fly Over Land
    Posts
    10,539
    Pass the mustard and UP THE REVOLUTION!

    St. Paul Pioneer Press , Minneapolis Star Tribune

  14. #44
    Registered User jeff.ferguson's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Omaha, NE.
    Posts
    45
    Bold move on this concept bike! If they bring something like this to the market BMW will find itself with a new, young, and much needed expanded customer base! Many purists may balk at it, but I for one think it rocks! I say build it and they will come! I mean seriously, look at the Ducati Diavel -did anyone think that would sell with its limited functionality? I see them all over the place now!

  15. #45
    No longer a member here
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,432
    Quote Originally Posted by jeff.ferguson View Post
    ? I see them all over the place now!
    In Omaha?? Have not seen one on the road yet, and I have been to quite a few places in the last 15 months.

    And BMW has to still come a long way to attract a younger crowd. First, they have to offer a bike in the 9-12K range that would compete in looks, image and performance with the Japanese sportbikes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •