What do you mean "fairly flawed Ks"? Remember, there are many BMW owners that feel that the K75 is one of the best, if not the best two wheel machine BMW has ever produced. Period. Personally, I think the R80 has a slight edge, but that's just me. If you get on a K bike expecting a boxer, you will be disappointed. Kinda like biting into an apple and expecting an orange.
Considering that BMW had been producing twins for about 75 years or so, they had plenty of time to refine the boxer engine design and riders knew what to expect. Then they came out with the the flying brick, and of course the public was not prepared for a non boxerish motorcycle. People don't like change and BMW owners are no exception.
Turn to history and you will see the flying brick has held up well over the years. Much better than the air cooled R60, the entry level bike just a few years before. If you compare the basic K75 to a entry level boxer like a R65, you can see, the K bike was a lot of bike for the money. If you take in to account the fact it was a radically new concept of machine for BMW, you have to admit, they did a damn good job.
Lynn
MOA #57883
Current Ride: 1995 K75 Standard
Past: 1978 Yamaha XS 750, 1976 BMW R60/6
Actually, it was 60 years (1923 - 1983).
You're right about an apples to oranges comparison! An R60 had 40 HP; the K75 had 75 HP. Even the R65 only had 50 HP. The K75 was also significantly more expensive than either of the Boxers.Turn to history and you will see the flying brick has held up well over the years. Much better than the air cooled R60, the entry level bike just a few years before. If you compare the basic K75 to a entry level boxer like a R65, you can see, the K bike was a lot of bike for the money. If you take in to account the fact it was a radically new concept of machine for BMW, you have to admit, they did a damn good job.
OTOH, I think you're right that the Ks, and especially the K motors, have stood the test of time very well.
Well Guys, I did say ABOUT seventy-five years. It was a guess on my part.
I have to admit, I would love to have another airhead, but not at the cost of loosing my K75. However, I never realized that the small boxers had such a low horse power rating. Only 40 HP for my old R60. Wow. No wonder it was so gutless.
The bike was under powered and the brakes sucked and the whole time I owned it, I could never claim that I had nothing to do. It seemed like there was always something to going on. Adjust the valves, change the points, etc. Always something. And yet, for some reason, people seem to love these underpowered machines over the black sheep K bikes. Why?
I have come to the conclusion that the early K bikes are the Rodney Dangerfield of BMW motorcycles. They don't get any respect.
Lynn
MOA #57883
Current Ride: 1995 K75 Standard
Past: 1978 Yamaha XS 750, 1976 BMW R60/6
(But what's the steam-powered model in the last few seconds?)
"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." Mark Twain
This one is pretty awesome.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tiqT_mQLrs
Tom - MOA #156706, Hayward, CA
2006 BMW R1200GS Adventure, aka "Gretel"
1983 Honda V65 Magna - SOLD
http://www.flyv65.com