Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 66

Thread: Corn lobby's response to all our ethanol threads

  1. #1
    rangerreece rangerreece's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Enterprise, AL
    Posts
    134

    Corn lobby's response to all our ethanol threads

    2005 R1200RT
    BMWMOA # 143779
    "Positive Habit Transfer is no substitute for Situational Awareness."

  2. #2
    Registered User David13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Lomita, California
    Posts
    761
    That's right! You'd be stupid if you didn't believe what we say, because ... We Say So!
    dc

  3. #3
    Registered User ItsPhilD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    128
    How about, "Hey, we're converting a food crop into fuel causing the price of corn to go drastically higher all around the world so the less fortunate have less too eat."

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    272
    I saw it on the internet so it must be true...
    1983 R100RS (Sold)
    2004 R1150RT
    BMW MOA 181289
    ABC 13558

  5. #5
    Mars needs women! 35634's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    2,012
    good PR doesn't let pesky facts get in get in the way. you believe how nasty those big oil companies can be?
    1987 K75S
    Original litter
    Original owner
    2012 Ural Gear Up

  6. #6
    God? What god? roborider's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    2,059
    I'm not certain they are not telling the truth. So, let's accept as 100% fact what they write.

    Such as:

    "...the EPA...approved a 15% blend of ethanol for all 2001 and newer automobiles."

    OK, great. I drive a 1989 truck and a 1974 motorcycle. That statement does not put me at ease.
    Rob C. , Raleigh, NC
    '10 R12RT, R90/6
    2007 CBR600RR & 09 V-Star
    Suzuki DR 350

  7. #7
    na1g
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Greater Bahstin, Massachusetts
    Posts
    791
    I like the study by the Iowa State University regarding corn ethanol and fuel prices. Now there's an objective study.

    pete

  8. #8
    Registered User rickyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    114
    The problem is that manufacturers don't necessarily approve E15 and in some instances expressly forbid it. EPA approval only addresses the environmental issue. That is their responsibility.
    The fact that 11 years after it was approved by the EPA, E15 is still forbidden in some cars shows manufacturers are not going out of their way to accommodate themselves to the change over, if there is going to be one. Or maybe they just see it as a potential out on fuel system warranty claims.

    But then we face more pressing issues as passengers headed towards the fiscal cliff.
    Rick

    '06 BMW R1200RT
    '74 Moto-Guzzi 850-T

  9. #9
    Registered User lkchris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    4,729
    Quote Originally Posted by 35634 View Post
    good PR doesn't let pesky facts get in get in the way. you believe how nasty those big oil companies can be?
    Ethanol has nothing to do with oil companies. It's simply extra expense for them and the profit goes to farmers and politicians, not them. They're not buying up farmland to get in on it.
    Kent Christensen
    21482
    '12 R1200RT, '02 R1100S, '84 R80G/S

  10. #10
    Registered User redsky49's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Near the NC coast
    Posts
    122
    Quote Originally Posted by lkchris View Post
    Ethanol has nothing to do with oil companies. It's simply extra expense for them and the profit goes to farmers and politicians, not them. They're not buying up farmland to get in on it.
    "...and the profit goes to farmers..."

    Let me guess - you are not a farmer. Don't confuse Archer Daniels Midland and the other big agribusiness for the average farmer.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Texas City, TX.
    Posts
    62
    Never believe anything out of the mouths of those who stand to profit the most from whatever it is that's being discussed. The only issue I'm concerned with is the manufacturers refusal to cover any fuel system problems that surface as a result of the higher alcohol content in our fuel supply. I was out in California a couple of week ago on a job. We rented a 2013 Toyota Rav4. I enjoyed the car as it's on my list as a possible replacement down the road for my current car. I couldn't help but notice when I filled it up before returning it to the rental company that the gas cap was stamped in big white letters, "NO E15 / E85" Personally, I don't care what E15 does for the environment if it's going to cause me a bunch of expensive problems with my car. And I'm an NOT impressed with the government certifying anything on this subject. Obviously, the manufacturers aren't buying into it. Unfortunately, I think we'll just have to wait and see!

    Ride Safe,
    Steve R.
    2013 R1200RT

  12. #12
    Nickname: Droid
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Green Bay, WI
    Posts
    2,352
    Ethanol blended fuels "may" burn cleaner than pure gas fuels in our vehicles. But the net result of producing, distributing (as in more tanker loads of E10 or E15) by diesel trucks, and getting less miles per tank, meaning more tank loads purchased, to me does not add up to any gains other than the dollars going into the pockets of the E10 and E15 producers.

    I don't buy E10 whenever I can avoid it up here in Wisconsin, and I certainly will NOT buy any E15, if possible. Interesting that the "facts about the TRUTH of ethanol" makes NO mention whatsoever about the reduced mileage per gallon when using ethanol blended fuels comapred against whole gas fuels.

    The quote strikes me as nothing but hype, "NASCAR has run on Sunoco Green E15, a fuel blended with 15% ethanol, for
    over 4 million miles." So what! NASCAR engines need the extra cooling capability of ethanol (water) partly because of the very high compression engines they run. The ethanol also helps reduce detonation issues, again in very high compression engines. Engines that can run at a far more rich fuel/air mix than we run in our cars and bikes. Engines that are also REBUILT at a very high rate to insure max power and durability. The ethanol fuel is just a small part about NASCAR, that has very little relationship to our everyday driven cars.

  13. #13
    Registered User rmcclure's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Erin, Ontario
    Posts
    639
    Who's going to be the first to sign up to tear down and inspect/rebuild their engine after 500 miles.
    Ross
    K1200LT (99), DL650A (08), XJ650RJ (82)

  14. #14
    Outlander Omega Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Mansfield,MA
    Posts
    6,302
    Just a reminder guys, we try to stay off the politics of issues did to the end result of "no win"- and bad feelings.
    The Mod Team.
    "Well they say.. time loves a hero but only time will tell.. If he's real, he's a legend from heaven If he ain't he was sent here from hell" Lowell George
    2009 F800GS 1994 TW200
    Part of the Forum Threadside Assistance Program

  15. #15
    Geoxman
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Trinity County, Calif.
    Posts
    1,232
    FACTS: Both are carbon based fuels and we need to get off both of them, if you are concerned with the quality of life our kids and their kids will have.
    Both have skin in the game and we receive propaganda from both.
    If you add in what it costs us (from our taxes) in subsidies to the oil giants, the actual price we are paying for gasoline is absurd! Many of us would stop driving our cars and trucks.

    Just saying.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •