Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Frame vs. Handlebar fairing

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Durham, North Carolina
    Posts
    164

    Frame vs. Handlebar fairing

    Please respond only if you have actually used both types of fairings. I need product tested feedback, not opinions (sorry to be so blunt). I am considering buying an expensive handlebar mounted fairing (Parabellum Scout). I have had a Vetter Windjammer III for 25 years, but am looking for something more aerodynamic. Is there anyone who has had both products? What can I expect in terms of:
    1. Wind and rain protection
    2. Noise and wind turbulence
    3. Handling (especially in wind)
    4. Gas mileage
    5. Durability
    6. Finish and overall craftsmanship
    Thank you for taking the time to respond.

  2. #2
    Registered User bmweuro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Cal
    Posts
    255
    They both do all six about the same. The biggest difference is the handlebar mount is not as safe at speeds or in the wind. Nothing like having a sail move the handlebars for you.
    www.boxermetal.com
    www.facebook.com/boxermetal
    VBMWMO #7770, BMW MOA #48694, ABC #600
    Hi my name is Chris and I am a slash-five-o-holic.

  3. #3
    Day Dreaming ... happy wanderer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C. Canada
    Posts
    1,815
    I've had both and agree with Chris. Frame mount is preferable from a stability aspect. They usually add more weight than handlebar mount. I've had more than a few hairy moments in high winds with bar mount fairings. On the plus side the adrenalin sure wakes you up.

    I might add that for item 1, I think you get more rain protection down low from a frame mount but this depends on which fairing we're talking about. A Vetter with lowers for example is pretty good in the rain.
    MJM - BeeCeeBeemers Motorcycle Club Vancouver B.C.
    '81 R80G/S, '82 R100RS, '00 R1100RT

  4. #4
    Registered User mikeyork5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    San Clemente, CA
    Posts
    31
    I have had both - you have/will recieve a much greater level of protection (wind/rain, etc.) from the Windjammer than the Parabellum. I used a Windjammer for many years, never had the Parabellum but have had fairings that were very similar. As far as stability, like said above, a frame mount is more stable but generally I have never found the handlebar mount to be any kind of an issue other than in the most extreme conditions.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    21
    couldn't agree more with all the above. I have had many bikes, and I would rather go naked these days vs handlebar.

    FYI - I just picked up an rt and a hannigan st for the r65/100, if I decide not keep one, would you be interested in it?

    j

  6. #6
    Administrator 20774's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    12,418
    Quote Originally Posted by beater View Post
    FYI - I just picked up an rt and a hannigan st for the r65/100, if I decide not keep one
    j -

    Please conduct any exchanges, etc., off the forum.

    Thanks...
    Kurt -- Forum Administrator ---> Resources and Links Thread <---
    '78 R100/7 & '69 R69S & '52 R25/2
    mine-ineye-deatheah-pielayah-jooa-kalayus. oolah-minane-hay-meeriah-kal-oyus-algay-a-thaykin', buddy!

  7. #7
    Registered User lmo1131's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Pismo Beach, CA
    Posts
    2,923
    just curious. what bike are you fitting?
    "It is what you discover, after you know it all, that counts." _ John Wooden

    Lew Morris
    1973 R75/5 - original owner

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •