Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: Glasses / Contacts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    rabid reader dbrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Santa Cruz CA
    Posts
    1,755

    Glasses / Contacts

    I am musing about moving from glasses to contacts. My wife has worn contacts for years, so I understand how theyÔÇÖre used and cared for. What IÔÇÖm interested in is hearing about othersÔÇÖ visual experience.

    I wear progressives with a mild distance correction and a moderate (~2.25) correction for reading. For me, progressives are very satisfactory for all purposes except riding: the change in focal length as my eyes momentarily drop below the horizon (as, for example, when selecting a line around a corner) is disorienting. When I ride, I wear bifocals with a very small segment, which allows me to read the instruments and gives me the distance correction for everything beyond the bike. This works just fine.

    The idea of one set of contacts that would handle both distance and close vision for both riding and non-riding is appealing. Mary wears monovision contacts, and I understand there are bifocal contacts as well. But I wonder about the focus issue mentioned above. Contact lens literature suggests that more head movement may be necessary to focus than with glasses, and, at least as importantly, that some depth perception may be lost.

    These sound like they might be disqualifying for motorcycling. If youÔÇÖve made this change and liked it, or declined to make it, or returned to glasses, IÔÇÖd like to hear about your experience. Thanks!
    David Brick
    Santa Cruz CA
    2007 R1200R

  2. #2
    USERNAME
    Guest
    dbrick - i moved this over to gear so hopefully more people will see it. (get it? yuk yuk yuk!)

    and to answer your question: glasses were a non-starter for me. i wanted full peripheral vision on the bike so i used to wear conacts for riding. i got tired of putting them in and out, and a multi-day trip with several 16 hour riding days strung together would've stunk. so i had LASIK surgery, and the rest is history. i highly recommend it.

    your eyes might be older than mine, so perhaps you wouldnt be able to read the instruments with just LASIK?

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,007
    Quote Originally Posted by username
    your eyes might be older than mine, so perhaps you wouldnt be able to read the instruments with just LASIK?
    depending on the patient, LASIK can be done to provide an eye for close work (dominent eye) and an eye for distance vision. expect "headaches" for a week or so why your brain figures it out.

  4. #4
    sMiling Voni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    53 sMiles south of Alpine, TX USA
    Posts
    4,613
    Or not.

    I've used the monovision contacts for years and find them to give me better vision than glasses alone. The only getting used to time was that I needed gas permeable rather than soft contacts so that took some increasing time for my eyes to get used to contacts. The new ones I got breathe so much better than the earlier versions. I really don't notice them.

    A miracle to touch my eyes in the morning and then see all day.

    Voni
    sMiling

    http://www.bigbend.net/users/glaves/
    Live fully. Laugh deeply. Love widely.
    BMW MOA Ambassador / FOM / Roving Forum Moderator/
    Selected Friends of Wile E Coyote/ A Million BMW sMiles

  5. #5
    Retired and proud of it MOTORMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Full time RV'er, wherever I park.
    Posts
    490
    I tried contacts and later RK for correction to eliminate the need for glasses. I had good results from the RK and I understand the new lasik is far better.

    One of the things I did learn is that to ride I still needed glasses. The contacts dried out and caused irritation and I still needed dark glasses. Even after RK I had issues with dryness and wanted dark glasses. At night I had increased sensitivity and wanted protection for the eyeball from dust and bugs.

    In short I still ended up using glasses just as much for riding and out door activities. Later when my eyes changed and I needed correction again I just stayed with the glasses. I use the ones that go dark outside instead of having 2 pair to deal with and have been happy with them.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    14
    I used to wear thick bifocal glassses prior to having lasik. I'm 50+, well closer to 60. The only time I have to use reading glasses now is to read fine print in dim light. I'd at least check into the lasik. I wish it had been around thirty years ago. I'd have saved a ton on glasses and contacts over the years.

  7. 07-31-2006, 11:13 PM
    Reason
    duplication

  8. #8
    Danger: Keep Back 500 Ft FredRydr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    central Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    1,265
    Quote Originally Posted by username
    ...glasses were a non-starter for me. i wanted full peripheral vision on the bike so i used to wear conacts for riding. i got tired of putting them in and out, and a multi-day trip with several 16 hour riding days strung together would've stunk. so i had LASIK surgery, and the rest is history. i highly recommend it...
    This exactly sums up my history, thoughts and situation. My gas-permeable hard contacts allowed me crisp peripheral vision, but I am 54 and after 38 years of contacts, I grew weary of the maintenance. Getting a foreign object and especially dust in my eyes became a major PITA. So, after years of reading about surgery and the advance of the safety and equipment, I had it done in May.

    My opinion? It is absolutely amazing. 20/200 to 20/15. One eye was left slightly less corrected to reduce the need for reading glasses, but I need reading glasses just as I did with contacts.

    One thing that I was not told clearly in advance: the surgery cuts through a nerve in the cornea that sends signals to the tear duct to produce tears, and I have to use drops a few times a day for months to compensate, until the nerve reconnects.

    I don't understand why anyone would want to wear glasses in a helmet. They fog up, peripheral vison sucks, and I sure wouldn't want them inside my helmet in an accident.

    I am experimenting with a small sliver of an Optx lens stuck on the bottom left-of-center of my faceshield for glancing at maps and GPS.

    Fred

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Whitefish Bay, WI, 3mi N Milwaukee
    Posts
    1,604

    vision correction: very interesting thread

    I wear tri-focals. The top bar is for distance (movies, riding, etc)
    The mid bar has a focal length of 20 to 36 inches (computer work, shooting, hands on stuff).
    The lower bar is good for 12-15 (reading and close work).

    I went to tri focals because I needed that mid-range capability.

    I have had in the past, the top of the midrange set at 4mm above pupil center, and that has worked out well. CAUTION: Be careful when start tinkering with that stuff, because it may interfere with your distance site line.

    I am not a candidate for lasik. I had to stop wearing contacts many years ago because my eyes would no longer tolerate them --started with hard, then soft, then gas perms, then that was it.

    my 0.02
    "What is beautiful is simple, and what is simple always works"....Kalashnikov, inventor of the AK-47.
    Currently bikeless, but looking hard! "Center yourself in the vertizontal. Ride a motorcycle...namaste' "

  10. #10
    Slowpoke & Proud of It! BRADFORDBENN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    State of Confusion
    Posts
    7,799
    I have contacts and glasses and prefer riding with contacts over glasses. Better peripheral vision. However I do travel with a spare set of contacts and keep lubricating drops in the tank bag.

    I am too chicken to do Lasik... so contacts do real well for me. Also in case of a get off I figure that there is one less thing floating around inside the helmet causing injury.
    -=Brad

    It isn't what you ride, it is if you ride

  11. #11
    chfite
    Guest
    I wear tri-focals. Top for distance, middle for ranges 24 to 48 inches or so, bottom 12 - 15 inches for reading. Mine are the kind with the lines. The lines enable me to set my head to keep the right segment in position for the task at hand.

    I find no loss of peripheral vision with glasses. I haven't had a problem with fogging of the lenses the way the face shield fogs. I also have astigmatism, which complicates the rest.

    I have been down before and my glasses stayed in place, but the helmet did not survive. I have been clobbered in soccer and not had my glasses come off.

    Lasik surgery seems quite appealing, though, for those of us who tire of glasses after 40 or more years.

    So far as the contacts are concerned, why not take them on a test drive? I tried them for 10 days many years ago to see if I liked them. I did not, but there was no cost.

  12. #12
    JCS97RT
    Guest
    I got the multi-focal soft lenses about four months ago. They have been far superior to the bifocal glasses or the single vision gas perms along with reading glasses. You give up just a little in both distance vision and close up from the contact/reading glasses combo (it is a compromise) but it is well worth it to need reading glasses only in extreme conditions (Very low light or very small print). I throw a cheap pair of readers in my pocket and rarely ever pull them out. I have been very pleased with the vision and comfort along with the added convenience.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Whitefish Bay, WI, 3mi N Milwaukee
    Posts
    1,604

    wavy peripheral vison with curved glasses/"wraparounds"

    If you cannot tolerate contacts, look into Zeiss curved sunglasses. Curved glasses with no wavy images. They came into the market about 5 years ago. An optomitrist who specializes is sporting sun glasses (fishing, shooting, flying, golfing, etc.) told me about them.

    They are EXPENSIVE! ...and mostly in big cities. In 2000-01, a pair costs about $2,200.

    anybody up for a ride to the Big Apple for flawless sunglasses?
    "What is beautiful is simple, and what is simple always works"....Kalashnikov, inventor of the AK-47.
    Currently bikeless, but looking hard! "Center yourself in the vertizontal. Ride a motorcycle...namaste' "

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •