View Full Version : Crazy impulse buy
32232
09-29-2009, 07:00 PM
I was on the way home from a trip with my wife when I stopped in at a Moto Guzzi dealer as I heard they had a V7 Classic in stock.
I think they are about the prettiest bike being made right now, my Triumph Scrambler being another. Retro bikes can perform as well; the Scrambler recently got me home from a 6500 km, two week trip around the Trans-Labrador Highway without a hitch.
One look at the V7C in person and it was true love. Way better than the pictures. Excellent fit and finish, with gorgeous deep pearl white paint. I love riding the Scrambler, and the Guzzi has been preferred to the Triumph classic line in a couple of tests. 401 lbs and the size of something from the 70's.
Needless to say, after a close inspection and the fact they had just hung a year end clearout price tag on it, I'll be picking it up on Saturday.
<a href="http://s444.photobucket.com/albums/qq163/bikebits/Moto%20Guzzi/?action=view¤t=2009-MotoGuzzi-V7Classicb.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i444.photobucket.com/albums/qq163/bikebits/Moto%20Guzzi/2009-MotoGuzzi-V7Classicb.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>
AKBeemer
09-29-2009, 07:16 PM
Impulse... maybe. Crazy....definitely not. Congrats!!!
GSfornow
09-29-2009, 07:36 PM
Way pretty!
kwillsey
09-29-2009, 07:37 PM
Congratulations, it is a beauty!
jamesdunn
09-29-2009, 07:53 PM
That there bike is one of my favorites. Harkens back to the 70's, when in my opinion bikes reached the perfect balance of form follows function. Apex of motorcycle design. Very nice!
Sweetpea
09-29-2009, 08:26 PM
Was in Calgary last week stoped by the BMW dealer on the way to the airport . They had the same breath taking Guzi on the floor. I almost made the same move but would have missed the filght. Been thinking about HER every day .
GREAT MOVE ON YOUR PART!!!!!
K-75s
Ossa 250 Plunker
KTM 250
Holly
09-29-2009, 08:49 PM
Gorgeous. I'll be watching for it on the roads around here.
Holly
Life's far too important to take seriously. Go for it!!!
And by the way, nice looking bike.
Easy :german
32232
09-29-2009, 08:58 PM
Gorgeous. I'll be watching for it on the roads around here.
Holly
Actually, you may see it. My folks live in Ancaster.
108625
09-29-2009, 11:23 PM
:thumb Those Italians are building the best looking retro bikes, hands down.
crazydrummerdude
09-30-2009, 10:58 AM
:thumb
535is
09-30-2009, 01:47 PM
The Airhead of the New Millennium ... :thumb
kgadley01
09-30-2009, 01:55 PM
Great looking bike. I've been thinking about a Guzzi also. I haven't heard of any FD problems...
Maylett
09-30-2009, 02:14 PM
Great looking bike. I've been thinking about a Guzzi also. I haven't heard of any FD problems...
Similar thoughts here.
Logic aside, and as often as not, I'll choose a bike based as much on emotional appeal as anything else. And lately I've been yearning for a Moto Guzzi — maybe a Norge or even a California.
Bill Burke
09-30-2009, 02:30 PM
Are you sure it's ok? It looks like the right hand cylinder got pushed up...parking lot tipover?
Congratulations. Looks like a blast.
jlaban
09-30-2009, 03:23 PM
Can you point me towards the tests you talk about (those that rated it over the Triumphs). It is one very appealing machine. I climbed on one late this summer and felt about like I did on my new Schwinn so many years ago.
John
kgadley01
09-30-2009, 03:52 PM
Similar thoughts here.
Logic aside, and as often as not, I'll choose a bike based as much on emotional appeal as anything else. And lately I've been yearning for a Moto Guzzi — maybe a Norge or even a California.
I believe the Norge is what would suit me best. anybody know what Norge means, stands for, etc..?
Maylett
09-30-2009, 04:10 PM
I believe the Norge is what would suit me best. anybody know what Norge means, stands for, etc..?
I believe that "Norge" is equivalent to "Norway" in many languages — including Norwegian.
32232
09-30-2009, 06:37 PM
I believe the Norge is what would suit me best. anybody know what Norge means, stands for, etc..?
The Norge was a Guzzi model that did an endurance run from the Italian factory to the arctic circle in Norway in 1928. It was the test bed for Guzzi's then ground breaking swinging arm rear suspension.
The new Norge was named after it.
32232
09-30-2009, 06:40 PM
Can you point me towards the tests you talk about (those that rated it over the Triumphs). It is one very appealing machine. I climbed on one late this summer and felt about like I did on my new Schwinn so many years ago.
John
John,
If you Google "V7 Classic review" you'll get a bunch of on-line tests. Two or three compare the V7 to other new retro bikes and the Guzzi is the favourite in every one I read.
This one in particular prefers it over the Triumphs: http://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/bikereviews/searchresults/Bike-Reviews/Moto-Guzzi/Moto-Guzzi-V7-Classic-2008-current/
kgadley01
09-30-2009, 08:41 PM
The Norge was a Guzzi model that did an endurance run from the Italian factory to the arctic circle in Norway in 1928. It was the test bed for Guzzi's then ground breaking swinging arm rear suspension.
The new Norge was named after it.
COOL!!! thanks...
jlaban
10-01-2009, 07:47 AM
Thanks for the info, Dave.
John
jamesdunn
10-01-2009, 09:58 AM
I believe that "Norge" is equivalent to "Norway" in many languages — including Norwegian.
Norway means literally " north way", so in a very real sense Norge translates as north way. "Guzzi North Way". Does not have quite the same ring.
sjbmw
10-01-2009, 10:04 AM
Gorgeous bike, congrats.
The "Standard" bike lives on.
bigdelta
10-06-2009, 11:42 PM
That's a stunner!
32232
10-11-2009, 06:30 PM
Well,
I've put a bit over 1000km on the little Guzzi in under a week and I thought I'd share some impressions. The first service is due at 1000km, and as riding season is rapidly drawing to a close here, I thought I'd get the service done and put her away with fresh oil etc.
I'll make some comparisons to the Triumph Scrambler, as I own one as well, and I know the Triumph Bonneville variants will be compared to the V7 Classic.
I'd read as many online reviews and tests as I could to have some idea of what to expect. My take is as follows:
Looks are completely subjective, but both of these designs are winners in my eye. When the Scrambler came out in 2006 with those high pipes and traditional Triumph lines I wanted one baaad. It took me two years to succumb, but there have been absolutely no regrets. Based on appearance and size, the Guzzi is perhaps truer to the models it emulates while at the same time being very sophisticated in detail. To borrow someone else's analogy, while these are both cover versions of the original songs, the Guzzi has put together a slightly better remake.
The Guzzi is cold blooded, and a couple of reviews said it is hard to start from cold. I discovered the trick to getting it to light up. Ignore the fast idle lever on the bars and crack the throttle open ever so slightly when pressing the starter. Touching the throttle is generally a no-no on FI bikes when starting, but it works like a charm. My Scrambler is of the carbed variety, but the choke can come off after a minute or so. They're equal here.
The different Bonneville variants claim horsepower in the mid fifties to mid sixties, with weight around the 450 lb mark. The V7 claims 48 hp with a weight of 401 lbs. The Scrambler definitely accelerates faster and the engine is a smooth, vibration-free marvel. It rivals an inline four with the character of a twin. The Guzzi vibes more at idle and smooths out at speed, but never equals the Triumph. I should note that the Scrambler has the 270 degree crank, so matches the firing characteristics of the 90 degree v-twin in the V7 . The fuel injection on the V7 is very well sorted out, and once warm it will pull from less than 2000 rpm. Fortunately peak torque is squarely at cruising speed, which helps overcome the horsepower deficit. Although the V7 is tractable with adequate power, the Triumph has enough extra ponies to make passing less of a gamble and the smoothness of the engine is superb for a twin. The Scrambler takes this one, but with the advantage of an extra 121cc.
You'll want to stay on the Guzzi's throttle to use the available power, however that is a good thing. I did not know factory exhausts could sound this good any more. It has a muted "Ducati on aftermarket pipes" growl that is intoxicating, without being loud. To get the same melody the Triumph requires an accessory exhaust, which will invariably be louder. Big win for the Guzzi on exhaust note.
It took the first couple of hundred km for the V7 clutch to bed in and now it's light and positive. A bit lighter than the Triumph, which has a broader engagement point. The Triumph clutch is a bit smoother in use.
The stock Guzzi Brembos are far superior to the stock Triumph brakes. I put an aftermarket EBC floating front disc and pad set on the Scrambler; that is probably close to being the Guzzi's equal. Stock, the Guzzi wins hands down.
An annoyance on the Triumph is the idiot lights can't be read in full sunlight. I replaced the bulbs with aftermarket LEDs, and now they are fine. The Guzzi's instruments and idiot lights are all LED lit, and are adjustable for three levels of brightness. The V7 LCD odometer in the speedo is matched by a similar info panel in the tach that has time or temperature. The odometer starts to count up distance travelled on reserve once the yellow light comes on. The yellow light does flicker on and off a lot before it decides to stay on. The Guzzi instruments, while retaining a nice traditional look, are a lot more sophisticated. Guzzi wins here.
Cycle parts: The paint and finish on the Triumph is very nice, but the chrome, while bright, is thin. I make it a point to never ride once winter salt goes on the roads. In spite of this, the rims on the Triumph got so rusty in one year that Triumph has authorized a warranty replacement. Kudos to Triumph for stepping up to the plate, but the rims shouldn't have rusted in the first place. The finish on the Guzzi is superb. Pearl coat paint looks inches deep, and small touches abound like the finishers placed over the joints where the frame bolts together where the Triumph has none. The Guzzi comes with a full, useful tool kit, the Triumph has an allen wrench under the side cover that is used for the laborious process of removing the seat. One turn of the key and the Guzzi seat is off. The Triumph has a separate steering lock (and key) for the fork lock, which is identical to that on a /5. The Guzzi lock is integrated into the ignition. Although both bikes seem well turned out at first glance, the V7 is much more refined based on details.
The Guzzi handles like it is on the proverbial rails. Steering is razor sharp and the suspension is perhaps too taught. One review I read said the factory sets the bikes up for carving the Italian Alps. I backed the preload off on the shocks and it is now much more suited to bumpy North American pavement. My Scrambler, as delivered, had extremely harsh damping in the forks and not enough in the shocks. I remedied that by going to lighter fork oil and Ikon shocks. I went for a ride on the Scrambler immediately after coming off the Guzzi and it felt like an RT by comparison. As delivered, the Guzzi is superior to the Scrambler in comfort and handling. Right now the Guzzi wins in the handling department with a 'tighter' feel, but the modified Scrambler is more comfortable. I'll fiddle with the Guzzi suspension to see if I can improve comfort without compromising handling.
Of course the V7 is shaft drive, and due to what must be a heavy flywheel there is a sideways bob when the throttle is blipped, familiar to BMW boxer owners. Due to the modest power output rear end jacking is minimal. The Triumph has a high quality X-ring chain and didn't require any adjustment in a 6500 km trip. Modern chains are nothing like those of decades ago and are now quite viable for a touring bike. That said, there's no need to carry lube or large size wrenches for adjustment on the Guzzi, so it gets the nod here.
The new Bonnevilles have built an enviable reputation as being as bulletproof as anything being built these days. The V7's "small block" power plant has been around for a few decades now, and all the bugs seem to be well worked out. We'll call this one a tie, with maybe a whisker of advantage to the Triumph if I can believe all the stuff I've read on the 'net. So far the accessories I've wanted for the Guzzi have been back ordered, whereas those for the Triumph arrived quickly or were in stock. Triumph has a more extensive dealer network, but Guzzi is undergoing a major expansion now that it is in Piaggio's hands. We'll give Triumph a win in the factory support column, but Guzzi's are a rarer bird.
Although both these bikes seem like similar retro styling exercises at first glance, they are significantly different to live with. The V7 Classic is much more refined in finish and execution but the wonderful engine in the Triumph is a joy to use. I'm going to keep them both, the V7 for commuting and the Scrambler for back road exploring. After over 25 years of BMW ownership my F800ST now seems superfluous. I'll make that decision come spring.
jamesdunn
10-11-2009, 07:09 PM
Thanks for the review Dave. A job well done. Glad you're enjoying the bike!
corbtown
10-14-2009, 09:33 PM
Gorgeous , outstanding and many other superlatives. How does it handle ??
corbtown
10-14-2009, 09:38 PM
I guess I skipped your reply post. Sounds terrific, and I can almost see the smile on your face. Hopefully everyone remembers the pleasure of a new bike. I'm still smiling from the bike I bought last Thanksgiving.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.