Rule of 100

[34]

I am 75 years old and have 32+ years in the club and have been given life time free membership based on the rule of 100 recently established. This was 25 years continuous membership plus 75 years of age. I have a friend who is quite upset because he feels he should qualify as he is 80 and has 22+ years which would seem to qualify under a rule of 100. How about some opinions??
:dunno

[KBasa]

Originally posted by Jim Slater
I am 75 years old and have 32+ years in the club and have been given life time free membership based on the rule of 100 recently established. This was 25 years continuous membership plus 75 years of age. I have a friend who is quite upset because he feels he should qualify as he is 80 and has 22+ years which would seem to qualify under a rule of 100. How about some opinions??
:dunno

Purely from the sidelines, with no vested interest, nor representing the MOA, it looks to me like he's come up short on the 25 year part of it.

:dunno



think i got enough disclaimers in there?

[MarkF]

It's not really a rule of 100. If it was any combination totaling 100 would work. I got my first membership in Aug 2000 and was 37 then. Theoretically, in 2032 I'll be 69 and have 32 years. Do I still have to be 75? Otherwise, those youngsters that got started at 20 will hit "100" at 60.

Mark F

[Rad]

Originally posted by Jim Slater
I am 75 years old and have 32+ years in the club

First, congrats on all da years both live'n and ride'n.

Second, Da 100 years rule. Use'n yur friends logic everybody who is 100 years old, even if they have never been on a bike, should get the life time membership.:eek